Robin Williams: The eyes had it.

10476358_926556337359498_9115691076940816802_n

There was always something about Robin Williams–something intangibly lurking behind the eyes that betrayed a sadness in direct disproportion to the joys he conjured in others. His face would smile, but his eyes–the EYES. They were different. They told of something other . . .

I’m of the belief that Williams’ stream-of-consciousness virtuosity was a component of his internal makeup; his hard drive was bigger and faster than the average. His software was constantly updating in direct disproportion to the world around him. He was, in effect, a MacBook Pro in a Commodore 64 world.

I believe his prescient gifts allowed his stupefying,  light-speed cognitions to see the world’s trajectory–its future–it’s nihilistic yearnings. And yet he couldn’t possibly convey it. He could see over the dashboard.

I also believe that same software was in no way equipped to handle the data. Something was missing; the eternal patch never made it to the download folder.

And so it crashed. Blue screen forever . . .

And I for one am saddened.

Posted in CS Lewis, Writing | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Social media, attention whores and Robin Williams

photo.PNG-3

Perhaps this should be where the conversation stops–The Instagram account of Zelda Williams–Robin Williams’ 25-year-old daughter.

This social media thread should also perhaps be the final rallying point, guest book, or sympathy card in social media.  But sadly, it is not.  A quick scour of both Robin Williams’ account as well as his daughter will immediately show that the need to post a comment somewhere knows no boundaries.  Pictures unrelated to you and I have become some kind of cathartic canvas upon which  unrelated people have chosen to vent their grief.

The need to be seen–a veritable whoring for vertical position has the same cumulative feel any riot has:  Once one neighborhood is torn up, liquor stores looted, electronics stores are plundered, it becomes a mundane task to root through the rubble and find your take.  Nope.  We’re moving to the NEXT neighborhood.

I simply could not believe it.  Picture after picture on both accounts started to fill with references to Williams’ death–even if the picture contained neither he nor his daughter.  People who had never graced either account (including myself to that end.) started jockeying to be the “first reverberating sage” on each pic.  One account managed to do it on a number of pics–as if they heard the news about his death and their FIRST reflex was to capitalize on it by gaining visibility.

If that’s where it stopped, then fine.  But the algorithm gets worse:

1) Ten people start posting Insta-eulogies.

2) One person questions whether Williams’ daughter was to blame for “not seeing this coming.”

3) Fifty people come back and start fighting over Williams’ virtual casket because the troll was successful.

One person even posited that since Williams “had gone over to entertain” our baby-killing troops in Iraq, that he was suffering some cumulative karma.

That’s right. Fifty-thousand more Galahads to the rescue.

The problem is, the daughter is now carrying the gripless emotional anvil of her father’s suicide.  Even if she stated reading the condolences, I guarantee you this.  She has stopped.  The sheer two-dimensionality of selfishness is brought into relief in a death that DOESN’T violate the gaming codes–much less one in which a little girl stares at the sky and asks why her daddy left her.

But it doesn’t stop there.  Journalists–perhaps the most vacant, empty-headed and self-important messiahs of the culture–have to make sure you and I know they “once interviewed Williams” about his “demons.”

They make sure you know that if THEY couldn’t have seen this coming, then you and I should just take comfort in the fact that NOBODY could.

Shut up. Shut up and get back to ignoring the massacre of Christians.

Here’s a tip geniuses: Robin can’t read your eulogies and vain exploits in vetting trolls with classless, Quixotic charges in the viewing parlor.

Get over yourselves.

 

Posted in Uncategorized, Writing | Tagged , , , | 4 Comments

This momentum thing can get addicting (Oh, and WHAT ABOUT posting one’s work to the blog?)

All right.  Seems like trying to pinch the germ of an idea out of one’s cerebral petrie dish is the hard part.  I’m already a chapter in to my work.  For me–THIS is the comparative cakewalk.

Those that have been following my semi-cryptic writing escapades have already realized I play my proprietary cards close to the vest.  I’ve noticed, some of you are exactly the opposite; you literally flesh out your work–on your blogs–chapter by chapter. What is it YOU know that I don’t?

I say this because I have what I believe to be great ideas.  What I don’t have yet is an agent.  I have a robust distrust in my fellow man in such a way that I can literally SEE the ravenous, idea-scavenging jackals with an already established literary agent running to print with some crummy, one-off and poorly-written expectoration.  And watching it get published, because maybe it was breaking new ground.

Then, I also see me; some marginalized “fifth Beatle,” carping about it all being “my ideas,” when it was.

Nicolae Tesla.  Nuff Said.

So I ask?  How free are you with your ideas in arenas like this?

 

Posted in Books, Writing | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

And . . . book . . . STARTED!

Screen Shot 2014-05-17 at 8.07.52 PM

A couple of posts ago, I stated that I had the idea for a non-fiction book–to wit: An academic satire; a good-natured Manchurian bloodletting of a humorless subject–but one in which I repair most of the wounds at the end.  Sure, the scar tissue is unsightly and nasty, but what good is a wholesale marauding if I don’t get to mean at least some of it?

I just looked:  Not a single detectable send-up of my subject matter in the mainstream. Anywhere. And in a world where you can’t even get to the moon without finding litter, pennant’s and tire tracks, that’s not a bad place to be–especially when the subject matter is growing exponentially in the professional world.

That said:

1) PROLOGUE:  DONE!

2) INTRODUCTORY CHAPTER: DONE!

Oddly enough, I think these were the hardest.  A couple more chapters and I’ll have a the propositional makings for trodding the Lombard Street of Getting Noticed.

Posted in Books, Uncategorized, Writing | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

A mishmash of Ukuleles, Yosemite, and Strum Shops

My buddy Rob phoned me up earlier in the year to see if I wanted to go to Yosemite and climb Half Dome.  I said yes.  Then I realized that seventeen-mile cardiovascular death march was going to require me to actually be in shape.

halfdome1

So, at 47 years of age–it’s back to the gym for me.  Lots of cardio, moderate weight training, and especially leg work.  August 20 is the permit date, and hopefully we will be ascending the ominous cables to summit without too much physical depletion–or an also-ran reprise of Bob Magic’s Shattered Air.

I’m on the slow road to dropping 20 pounds, and it looks like I might pull it off before caloric gate time.

photo-7

I’ve stepped out and started carping about teaching guitar and ukulele.  I know the word ukulele has a rich tendency to make one take the next literary exit, but just humor me for a moment.  I get it.  That appalling Tiny Tim helped coagulate the instrument in the musical bloodline as a toy, but just sit back for a moment and see if the potential doesn’t loosen the clot here:

Aside from being a writer, I have protracted plans to build a student base, quit my current, soul-sucking job and say “I’m going to work today.  I’ll be playing guitar.”

What a drudge, huh?  And if you’re wondering yes, I’m a good player.

The ukulele has something the guitar does not, however:  Sonic limitations that keep the journeys simple–even if the music is complex.  It seems and IS–attainable–even to those whose confidence has been the prohibitive factor in their apprehension when it comes to learning an instrument.  And while I usually HATE populist rhetoric on all levels–it truly is “The people’s instrument.”   Hit me up if you’re into Skyping a four-string journey.

strumshot

I recently attended The Strum Shop’s monthly play-along in Roseville, Ca. (Last Saturday, actually) and I was blown away by the enthusiasm I saw.  The entire music store was PACKED with people of all musical calibers; all with their ukes, tuners and club-centric songbooks.  They sat and jammed and sang some twenty-odd songs before leaving.  I managed to spend a some money as well before leaving, but I did not leave before my longtime friend and store owner, Stu Herreid, helped further metastasize my enthusiasm for the instrument by giving me a TON of teaching resources and advice.

I’m telling you one thing.  The Beatles’ O-Bla-di, O-Bla-Dah is possibly the funnest song I’ve ever strummed in my life.  A little research on the broad berth of available ukulele arrangements will show that practically no arenas remains untouched by those making compositional transpositions.  The Frozen soundtrack for one (and I have already hacked out my OWN finger style version of Let it Go. I’ll be posting a short video soon).

That is not to say everything fits.  Though I have to at least applaud the genuine marketing risks taken here, even though I think it nearly impossible to miss a target audience more than this:

Unknown

Just think about it for second.  Minor modalities are possible on four strings, but c’mon.  How in THE WORLD is one supposed to serenade one’s own slide into perdition with music that was deliberately constructed in the dropped-tuned, subterranean thunders of the electric guitar and transpose it to the ukulele?

Next up: Slayer performs Tiny Bubbles at NAMM.

Posted in Books, CS Lewis, Music, Ukulele, Uncategorized, Writing | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

And another book idea has hit me

So the other day, I was listening to a couple of morning guys in the Northern California area, Armstrong & Getty.  Being that they’re on the radio, I can never seem to mentally parse which one is saying what, but one of them hit on something I referred to in an earlier post: The inability to concentrate on reading a book anymore.  Specifically–fiction.

It was like I’d found a support-group homie with that one statement.  It occurred to me that it is fiction that really causes me to start going all D.B. Cooper in my thinking when I try to get into it.

This is why I haven’t been able to finish a number of books.  I want to.  I know they’re good.  But something about the exigencies of the day causes my mind to go all test-pattern.

It then occurred to me that this is what is driving my apprehension for starting the fiction novel I have in my head.  Trust me, the idea is awesome.  But I am now wondering whether or not I’d be able to get my own head around my own work well enough to make it count.

This is why I have trouble re-reading Lewis’ Chronicles of Narnia but can fly through one of his apologetic works fairly fast (I will say, The Screwtape Letters would be the lone outlier here).

And I believe this comes down to applicability.  The older I get, the more minimalist I become on many levels. The more I guess I’m looking for genuine accelerant as opposed to redwood chips.

A short while back, I was poring over an “academic textbook” if you will–that has zero sense of humor (although I think the term ‘academic “textbook” probably made that case for me anyway), and I believe the subject has not yet been properly satirized.  I’m not talking cheap, two-dimensional volleys from the Cracked magazine threshing floor, but a genuine “alter-ego” look at the subject.  Packaged in academic form to boot.

Somehow, I actually think my immersion the subject itself allows me to possibly write the thing in a few weeks, between work and upcoming exploits.  I furthermore believe it might actually sell.

An immediately, after this contemplative session, my brain possesses NONE of the apprehensions, ticks, turns and paroxysms it does when I think of trying to build a character mosaic ex-nihilo.

Posted in CS Lewis, Uncategorized, Writing | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Four blurbs you’ll never read anywhere else

I simply have to thank Lynette Noni for bringing the following legendary exercise in pith and summation back to the front of my mind. Little did Rick Polito know in 1998 that his witty rundown of classic movie lore would be THIS legendary:

oz_2701

Now, as these things have it, this kind of viscerally-accurate Molotov cocktail only engenders imitation. Most of them pretty pathetic and cloying overall. I suspect this is mainly because the imitators immediately default to the cynical knob setting when trying to do it.

In reality, the ability to blurb and summarize is an incredibly valuable skill. It’s actual value, of course, lies in the ability to maintain informational integrity while doing so. Polito’s blurb, and its associated viral track on Reddit—lie in the fact that it distills only the harsh negatives. In journalism, it’s almost akin to “burying the lede,” as they say. Monty Python sort of broached this kind of absurdity in The Meaning of Life.  John Cleese, playing the part of the wigged headmaster, gives the boarding school children their morning “briefing” as it were. This contains the usual and boilerplate information, pedestrian reminders and reaffirmation of the myriad of rules and restrictions. He then excuses the boys out of the auditorium. And an afterthought, he calls out one young man from the adjourning group and says, “I’ve been informed that your mother has just died. Good day!” and walks out.

I’ve always found this kind of gamesmanship fascinating. And while I find myself doing these kinds of things ad hoc, I figured it might be fun to make a few protracted runs—analyzing what is intended before intent is committed.

1) Making the lighthearted into dark

Polito’s Wizard of Oz synopsis makes the theme way darker sounding than it is. Although I must admit, the film always left an eerie, aromatic vapor in my subconscious when I’d watch it every year. So the goal is pick a candidate with zero ominous underpinnings, and then try to hack out the bald exercise in disproportion:

Gilligan’s Island (7PM) A demographically-diverse group of shipwreck survivors struggle to maintain distance between themselves and a default, primal descent into cannibalism.

2) Making the ridiculously-horrifying benign.

This, of course is theoretically easier; taking things out—or committing the deliberate sin of omission. Way more fun and perhaps the logical starting point for the novice:

JFK (9PM) School books, sultry days and a trip to the hospital. Little John learns to salute in spite of a hastily-interrupted road trip.

The red phone just rang. Someone on the other end said “too early,” and hung up. I’ll do another:

The Exorcist (12AM) A young impressionable discovers that board-games enhance her mild interest in theology.

3) Making the completely meaningful meaningless.

Quite frankly, I happen to think the majority of the world around me comes outfitted with this algorithmic mechanism in pre-production. But why not line up in the government-funded line marked Nihilism for a few, creative seconds? Thus:

Schindler’s List (Travel Channel) A corporate magnate struggles with timely data entry.

Okay. The truly savvy will notice that I’ve failed to invoke the true, postmodernist muse to ruin it. But I tried.

4) Making the meaningless sound meaningful

.The search for meaningless media is akin to shooting water in a barrel. Geeves, cue up a giant helping of abject vacancy, please:

Keeping up with the Kardashians (9PM) A father’s willingness to change is at the heart of a blended-family’s everyday struggles with relationships, money and self-actualization.

I’m going to stop. Mainly because I have no reasonable expectation of getting a job doing only this. But the “academic exercise” has been a lark.

Time for me to now “open up the phone lines” as they say. Have at it. Do your worst. Thrash about. Let the world see what kind of absurdity YOU—have tucked away on the shelf.

Posted in Books, Uncategorized, Writing | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Step Number Five: Wait.

I promise that this blog will eventually become something other than a syncopatedly pathetic drip of information concerning the journey of ONE measly little article.  Now comes the whole “naked in front of the doctor AND my wife” sort of disembodied feeling. Right now, somebody is poring over my writing, most likely saying “what in THE WORLD?  Is this man on drugs?  I mean, he’s funny and all, but I’m not sure this kind of calibrated schizophrenia will fit within our comparatively mellow subject matter.”

It literally feels like I imagine it feels to be a color blind guy working for the bomb squad. Through the static-ridden, Tandy Corporation radio comes the following directive:

“Clip the red wire.”

 

Posted in Books, Writing | Tagged , , , , , , | 7 Comments

Step Number Four: Actually WRITE the confounded piece

I should have guessed that some kind of cerebral embolism was going to hit me the minute I realized my writing would be up for active evaluation.

“Be yourself,” my wife says.

“That’s the part I’m afraid they’ll hate,” I say.

Nonetheless, I have plundered through a traumatic, off-season Iditarod and written a piece.  I am sincerely hoping they think I’m a witty, rhetorical Anakin Skywalker and call it a day.

Oh yeah, I toned down the pyrotechnics a bit.  I might be a literary Captain Ahab, but for now, I’ll hide in the pathos of his “pre-whale” nautical pursuits.

Just over a thousand words–and I’m in a fetal position in sackcloth and ashes.  Oh, and I’m not beyond some reflexive oedipal thumb sucking if it calms me down.

Posted in Writing | Tagged , , , , , | 3 Comments

How in THE WORLD am I supposed to write in Starbucks, when the monk behind me is using an iPad?

I have this swirling, pessimistic algorithm I use.  It’s called the “bail of hay” theory.  In summation:

  • I’m driving a convertible along Route 66
  • Overhead, a C-130 drops a bail of hay from altitude.
  • Said bail of hay’s trajectory meets that of said convertible–perfectly.

It’s sort of like Murphy’s Law, but it’s one I tend to internalize more.

Such is the case with now.  Whatever kind of seething, nether-wraith from the ninth pit decided it would be most swell to hit me with this OCD–invoking anachronism knows good and well what it’s doing:

monk1

Sure sure.  I’m aware that not every sequestered man of the cloth has lept of the white cliffs of Benedictine poverty, but c’mon.  An iPad?  I can’t write now.  St. Augustine’s probably scouting Limewire for “sweet flows.”  I simply do not have the compartmentalist talent to ply my trade with such conflicting worlds.

And besides. He’s probably reading my blog.

 

Posted in Reading, Uncategorized, Writing | Tagged , , | 7 Comments