If I live to be an old man, I want to geocache and obfuscate.

My father was born in 1918 and grew up in the Depression. He liked messing with stuff. And since the Depression limited one’s ability to acquire pre-packaged “stuff to mess with,” he learned to combine stuff not-meant-to-be-combined to have a rollicking good time. You know, like the Little Rascals.

In fact, my dad was the type of guy that may have been completely capable of feeding his awkward, crooning nitwit of a friend a soap sandwich for violation of the He-man/Woman-haters credo. He certainly would’ve tried to break up Miss Crabtree’s engagement. He was also capable of wiring a Model T coil to a metal pan, filling it with chicken feed and watching a stupid huddle of chickens alternate in  piston-like jumps while continuing to feed.

It was he that introduced me to the mysterious cryptogram; and I have always been infatuated from that day with the idea of “hidden messages.” He was always finding some mystery—some hidden, cryptographic undertone for which he wanted me to search. He wanted me to experience magic. Mystery. The next horizon. Plus, even in years preceding his death at 86, he was STILL “messing with gadgets.”

As a kid, this of course translated to the use of “invisible ink,” which turned out be the not so vainglorious use of lemon juice with the heat from a lighter as the revealing catalyst.

.BookAlvinsSecretCode

I then got a copy of Alvin’s Secret Code when I was a little kid (and I have that exact copy to this day, acetone yellowing and general bibliographic rigor mortis notwithstanding). I was hooked. Me and the cipher would forever be associated.

And I looked up the author, Clifford B. Hicks. Dude kept the magic rolling until the age of ninety.

So while Diane sawyer was practically slamming back straight shots of whiskey on the Rose Line to commemorate the cinematic premier of The Da Vinci Code’s obfuscatory slap on the Deity of Christ, I was just finishing the book, completely infatuated with the idea that there may be hidden messages—and completely able to distinguish that from the idea that those messages might be stupid.

Dan Brown was no idiot. He made a million selling a stupid idea wrapped in the coolest of vehicles: The Hidden Code.

His book, of course, gave way to a literary high colonic of books trying to bridge cryptography, the Illuminati, and the Rene les château. Most of them lame, to say the least. I say that because I think the authors failed to see the magic in the mystery, and rushed to print with their little algorithms involving the appealing elements of church corruption, car chases through Rome, and some codex buried underneath the cornerstone of some masonic temple. But I’ll explore all that another day.

Even Walt Disney was capable of hiding things in plain sight. But even if his clandestine Easter Eggs weren’t so centered on ciphers, his penchant for cars, haunted houses, pirates, Mark Twain and Swiss Family Robinson proves beyond a shadow of a doubt; he wanted to keep it magical.

This is, of course, the allure of Geocaching—a combination of codes, GPS searches, hearsay, artifice, ruse, subterfuge, and the occasional “20 paces . . . “ crypto-cartographic pirate lore tossed in for good measure. I have a few of these planted myself, most notably, Davy Jones’ Foot Locker.

And I’m in my late forties, people.

Of course, Thomas Jefferson was no wilting violet. He made this:

0175

He made this for Meriwether Lewis. He didn’t make this in a vacuum, however. This cipher actually bears similarity to one published in 1516 by a Benedictine Abbott in Germany. It is what is called a Substitution Cipher.

The same kinds of ciphers Hicks was using in Alvin’s Secret Code.

Same kinds of codes explored in National Treasure, which of course channels Jefferson—or at any rate, lives off his fumes. And made me at least temporarily think Nicholas Cage could act.

Come to think of it. All this stuff seems to emanate from the minds of men who refused to fully grow up.

And there’s something in that, I think.

Posted in Books, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Protected: If You Want To See A Master In Action

This content is password-protected. To view it, please enter the password below.

Posted in Uncategorized | Enter your password to view comments.

Ronny Mnemonic (The Gospel Of John Project)

2345962

I’ve always been fascinated by astounding feats of memorization. Whether it be card, counting, the playing of a symphonic piece memorized sheet music, or the extended and unaided soliloquy.

I’ve always been fascinated by astounding feats of memorization. Whether it be card, counting, the playing of a symphonic piece memorized sheet music, or the extended and unaided soliloquy.

As a kid, I thought this stuff was normal anyway. If I heard something I wanted to repeat in rapid-fire from, I’d find a way to get my hands on it. This was particularly poignant when, during my Saturday morning childhood cartoon regimen, I watched Bugs Bunny take two malevolent hillbillies, and lead them to beating each other to a pulp in square-dance cadence call. It was a sketch called “Hilbilly Hare.”

Back in the day, there was no Tivo–no internet, not even the readily available VHS hookup. So confined I was, sitting ready with a bright red tape recorder from Radio Shack to capture it.

And memorize it I did. And my “rat-tat-tat” recapitulation to my peers always got a laugh.

This continued with the now-discredited Mike Warnke, whose rebuke/exorcism tirade on his first comedy record  (“Tennessee Home and Blankety-Blank”) was a hit within the peer group I carried at the time.

Years later, I discovered The Memory Book, written by Harry Lorayne and Jerry Lucas (The former is a prolific card magician that would later influence my career greatly) would place within the realm of possibility amazing feats of mnemonic prowess.

Turns out, Aristotle was employing structures like this when he gave speeches. Referred to as Loci, it was a technique of breaking down the essential sections of a speech one desires to deliver, and mentally attaching it to the rooms of one’s own house. Thus, the intro and thanks would be at one’s doorpost, the overview the Living Room . . . and so on, until one’s act of mentally walking through their own house, would be welded to the essential points of the speech.

These techniques are laid out in The Memory Book, and at the height of my practice, I could count cards (in reality, I could tell you what cards were left in play after post-play cards were revealed) And No, this is NOT the technique that got Ben Affleck Bo-Peeped right into the Griffin Book)

But today, I still can–memorize an extremely long number, or a list of 50 zip codes.

And yet, I have no cerebral one-up on you. All one needs to do is put in the preparatory time. The benefits are yours after that.

A few years ago, I co-opted C.S. Lewis’ The Screwtape Letters for a soliloquy of my own. I interspersed a few letters as enhancements to a dialogue that I wrote myself. This took some doing to memorize and perform.

Most recently, (Last Easter), I was the principal narrator in a play, John, His Story. Originally written to cover 27 characters, Jeanette Clift George, the playwright, also engineered the play to have all 27 characters played by FOUR actors.

Thankfully, we didn’t do that. We had 13 people.

But reading the play, and then going back to John, it made me wonder whether George’s inspiration came from a desire to memorize the entire book for monologue, and ultimately settled for a distilled clarification that is the play as it is (and it is one of the most brilliant, minimalist, and smart Easter themes I’ve ever seen).

Now, memorizing the 879 verses that encompass John; 21 chapters–is a rather daunting undertaking.

But is it really? By the time you and I are done repeating the lyrics to all the songs that marked us in our prime, we’ve already surpassed that. In fact, think about the obscene amount of latent memorization you may have done simply by listening to that endless nautical venture into echoplex hypnosis, The Wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald, by Gordon Lightfoot.

Come to think of it, don’t.

Throw in Hotel California, and you’re well on your way to realizing–it’s just not that big of a deal.

I decided at some pont many years ago, that I wanted to do this. Then I heard  Howie Tiller had supposedly memorized the whole book, and so I figured, hey. Why not?

So in the near future, I’ll be breaking down the entire book to a regimen that, should be attainable by most–if you want to do something like this: Five verses a day, Monday through Friday, with the weekends off for mental rest, and really, the cogitative recovery that solidifies this into the mind.

We can do this. I plan on launching this. Soon. Feel free to join me.

Posted in CS Lewis, Gospel Of John Project, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

(NOTE: This little screed was written circa August of 2012, and managed to ferment in the airtight basement that is FaceBook. It perhaps got more attention than anything else I’ve ever written there.  My hope is you get a laugh here as well.)

20100730-pothead

I work in law enforcement. And I support the legalization of marijuana.

Surprise you? Make you smile? Well, don’t get yourself worked up into a convivial ticker-tape confab just yet, because you may not appreciate the scope of just why I do.

My reasoning simply exists as a sort of fingerling tributary off the “because it will de-criminalize the market and it can be taxed” bromide. The exception being that I am not really interested in devaluing the black-market capitalist motivations of Chronic moguls as much as I am in devaluing the definitions of two other terms impregnated at the rhetorical cathouse: Patient, and Co-Op.

The reasoning? because legalization will immediately undermine the contrived sanctimony of these two terms and bring them back their original, definitional terra firma: Stoners. You are in fact, a basic, uninteresting toke monkey.

I’m willing to vote in your incapacitating latitude just to shut you up, and the sanctimonious horse you rode in on. I don’t want to hear about your “post traumatic Stress Disorder” anymore. You weren’t hit with a roadside bomb, you sprained your wrist at South City Park. You weren’t pumped full of plasma at a M*A*S*H* unit in South Korea. You sustained a paper-cut using a plastic shard to reveal a Scratch-Off at 7-11.

Since when does one’s desire to burn one allow you to make the sophist leap to a Purple Heart?

I simply want you to have the freedom to say “I like checking out. I like not working and having you do it in my stead. I just like being a loser.” See, I don’t want you borrowing the definitions that actually meant something when my 2 1/2 year-old daughter nearly died in the hospital from a five-day flu that dehydrated her to the edge of the mortal curtain. You? You need marijuana to do what, exactly? Help you kick your addiction to employment? Make your PlayStation manual more user-friendly?

You act like Marijuana is the palliative panacea for everything: Chickweed, post-nasal drip, bi-polar turns, Eczema, Plantar Fasciitis, open-wounds, leg-amputations, and can perhaps reveal in some side-channel of elightenment how the Egyptians managed to block and tackle all those callibrated stones at Cheops’ Pyramid in Giza. Just quit it. Tylenol does more for what you try to claim you get out of smoking a blunt–it’s just that smoking Tylenol doesn’t allow you to draw long, interpretive impressions from the Sergeant Pepper’s album cover and make excuses for regrettable, procreative sex with people for whom you NEED the “I blacked out” excuse.

As for these self-aggrandizing co-op doohickeys, I have even less respect for you. How many times in my local paper am I going to have to listen to you, donning sackcloth and ashes, acting like the already-lenient laws are the equivalent of buying a truckload of Ipads with pediatric Leukemia research money? How many times am I going to have to read another paragraph, where another pajama-clad co-op do-gooder tries to galvanize their mission into terms as if they’re Florence Nightingale, setting up tourniquets on the battlefield of the Crimean War? Nobody of any real thought pursuit buys this load of rubbish beyond the saccharine predication of the newsprint.

You’re not Patch Adams, champ. You’re a pot dealer hiding in the skirts of Dr. Quinn.

Of course, there are mitigating issues. I get it. Nausea after Chemo? Yep. I have it on good authority that it works. Swimmingly. Oh, yeah, I forgot. My friend’s post-chemo regimen to ameliorate nausea using marijuana meant imbibing it orally–not stuffing the bowl of a four-gallon motorized bong with Colombian Gold and excoriating her lungs while trying to talk through harsh-cough.

I know, I know. She wasn’t taking it as prescribed. Shut up again.

Oh, and for the “but alcohol kills more BLAH BLAH BLAH” argument: Guess what? You’re right. You’re still a loadie, I still don’t drink, and I’m still right about your annoying comandeering of passive terms for your toke-up.

So that’s it. I don’t care if you play for Team Stoner. Chances are I’ll still like you. Chances are I will have acquaintances that manage to do it socially from time to time. I just want you to take off the jersey of the first-string Team With Legitimate Medical Concerns. And if I have to vote to legalize the stuff so that you’ll crawl back into your VW and resume smoking yourself into some odd, moralizing half-light, fine. Just get out of my lexicon.

Posted on by Ron Giesecke | 6 Comments

Minimalism’s Groove

If you don’t mind, please give your attention for the next three-and-a-half minutes to a one–Brushy One String:

The very things that we find amazing about him (aside from his affinity for camera-mugging-personality) is the idea: HOW–does he get so much out of so little?

He’s playing two. TWO–notes.

Now go get a ukulele and put your index finger on THIS spot:

photo.PNG

Strum it.

Congratulations. You’ve played a C Major chord with as little effort as possible. And the first chord to Iz’s “Somewhere over the Rainbow.” You’ve got five or so left if you want to learn it.

I remember a time when I was obsessed with the sheer plurality of “gear,” no matter the job, hobby, endeavor, goal, or whatever. This particularly was the case, when I started playing guitar. It was the 1980’s and I believe I actually started playing around the age of 13.

The eighties were an embarrassment of potential guitar riches for a wannabe. I mean, by the time I picked up a guitar, Eddie Van Halen had barely been three records deep and “Eruption” was the Paganinni’s 24th caprice of the electric guitar. At the time, the “Cadenza”–or guitar solo–was a prerequisite for EVERY song, pop, rock, country, and even New Wave.

The irony was, I was playing the riff to “Smoke On The Water.” Four notes.

All the attention to coolness came from the simplicity of the core issue: the music.

But the 80’s also placed in me the idea that to be good–or sound good–I needed five Marshall stacks, three digital delays, a wah pedal, a Floyd Rose locking nut system with fine tuners, a scalloped neck, and a host of effects that took the labor out of tone, and allowed one to plow away as the Dionysian rock god we all wanted to be.

And thus, the pressure was internal. All the desire to “make it one day” was eternally suffering at the hands of some self-imposed acquisitional doctrine. Did I mention that Brushy One-String has 50,000 more hits than my dopey film I made?

I can stretch this example across nearly everything I have come to learn in my life. It’s not good enough to read one book by CS Lewis at a time. No, I MUST scour Ebay and used bookstores obsessively until I find them all. So instead of digesting the apologetics, the theological parallels, the beautiful analogies, I’m more concerned with hoarding until some quasi-intellectual Y2K hits–which probably never will.

So one day, I learned to intersperse a “groove” while playing the guitar, but a self-generated one; one devoid of drum machines, loop generators and the like. I started playing the guitar with a percussive undertone. This is something that I am now applying to the Uke as well.

The next thing you know, I noticed it got the attention of a listener. Less was truly more. I stated to look inside for the source of the “groove,” and not have it delivered via FedEx overnight.

When I picked up Tenkara fishing, it allowed me more time to read the water and to scope out my stealth and positioning. Fumbling with gear, lines, leaders, split shot and the timing of a may fly hatch IS fun. That in itself is a journey I’d encourage all to take.

As was the time I ran my Ukulele through my tube amp with an overdrive pedal. It was virtually indistinguishable from a guitar like that. But I lost the Uke in the process.

This is why–and I am now formulating my approach-my guitar and Ukulele classes I will be teaching will be different from normal. I want you to have a competently made instrument that doesnt kill your hands. I want you to make the appropriate introductory investments.

But then, we’re going to talk about groove. Timing. Space. Phrasing. How to make even the banal-sounding scales around cool and intriguing, instead of sounding like a rudimentary clarion call to Jack Kevorkian.

So go back to the video for a second. Ask yourself a question. If that guy were doing a seminar–if that guy decided to have one closed-door logrolling session for a day, with the promise to teach YOU how to play “Chicken in the Corn” with reasonable ease, do you think it would sell out? I do, and not because of novelty. Because he has the groove we all love in our music.

And if you don’t believe me and my new, Wooten-esque obsession with groove, I simply submit to you the following proof:

“Aint nobody got time for that!”

Case. Closed. Rhythm Eschewer.

I can play Bach’s Bouree in E Minor on all six. I’ve learned a few complicated bits for the sake of breaking down the seven modes inherent in the Ionian(Major) scale. And I love those things, and they will forever be a part of my public repertoire.

But sometimes I just want to jam like Brushy One String.

Posted in Guitar, Music, Tenkara, Ukulele, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

A Pathetic Emetic

So I’m sitting and talking with a fellow fly fisherman the other day, when the passing mention of my Tenkara rod managed to cataclysmically-irrigate the soda he was drinking into a 90-degree spray spectrum. Somebody driving by stopped and asked, “Are you re-seeding a lawn?”

My friend looked at me. “It’s your fault,” he said. “You had to mention that thing, didn’t you?” To him, Tenkara is a bittersweet combination of:

1) A punch line to the world’s greatest joke, AND
2) A reason to actually believe I am the world’s funniest man.

Neither of these is true, although I can find and assimilate a number of people who would argue both points with me. But all of this rigmarole DID get me to thinking about a more general problem of which I have encountered for years, and has me question: Why are people always holding ME responsible for their pie-hole spray? It seems I am continually saying something that causes people to do this.

So many times it has been that I have logged onto my computer early in the morning, only to have an email from a friend or acquaintance, claiming that I bear some degree of visceral blame for some inorganic liquid making a forceful exit from their olfactory channels. Most of it blamed on some unplanned broadside that came out of my mouth. Some of it on something I wrote somewhere (Memo to my co-workers: that smart-alecky, dual-edged-and anonymous, management-eviscerating sign in the break-room was written by somebody else). By the power of my skillful amalgamations of imagery and wit (and apparently by proximity “dapping with an implied bamboo willow”) , I can, through some external and unconnected power, turn the unwitting milk consumer into an expectorating, cranial Claymore mine—by rhetorically activating the pneumatic turbine that has been hiding all along in their own face.

I’ll admit. Even the skilled and circumspect are subject to the violent onslaught. I myself discovered that my friend David could remotely bilge-pump half my cappuccino through my sniffer, with merely screaming, “He just squeezed a nickel!” out a San Francisco hotel window (of course, the scattering multitude’s exodus from a magnum opus drug deal in front of the liquor store below did help. I laughed so hard, that I actually experienced another, traumatic venture in hydroponics that will remain free of elaboration).

My friend Larry told me I owed him a new keyboard with some verbalized, unindemnified assault of hydraulic rhinoplasty. I understand he is adjusting to his uni-nostril quite nicely. I wish him the best. I promise. I won’t refer to the better of two horrible options as “the leper with the most fingers” anymore.

At least Tim is able to confine his reactions to the pedestrian and “I’ve already thought of that” smirk. That is at least for now. Just wait. I’ll lie in wait in the tall grass of opportunity with one indecorous analogy, and that’ll be it: snotty catharsis.

The question is, just how dangerous is this phenomenon? Maybe I should I place an indemnity clause on the masthead that says. “Hi. And welcome to Master Of None . Sometimes I write witty and observationally-atrocious things. Sometimes it’s even about Tenkara fishing. If you happen to inadvertently atomize half a Slim Fast meal through the upper half of your head, it’s not my fault. Humor is entirely subjective. Have a nice day.”

It’s the liability that scares me. Sure, it’s all fun and games now, until I have Joseph Merrick serving me papers claiming he’s a circus sideshow because he read the some analogy I crafted using DB Cooper jumping out of a plane, or a rogue NASCAR vehicle plowing into the concession stands to illuminate someone’s aberrant reaction to normal stimuli, and managed to force gallons of unregulated Perrier out his Cochlear channels. Sure, I’d argue that his damage came from a suppressed sneeze, or Thalidomide fallout, but whom are they going to believe? The silver-haired smarty-pants? Or the Elephant Man? You guessed it:

JUDGE: “Pay the Cleft, wiseacre!”

ME: “Yes, your Honor. I’ll just leave the name blank and wedge it above your upper plate, ok?”

JUDGE: “Now leave, and If this court comes to the understanding that you have written anything else under the nom de plumes of Dapper Donny, Cane-Pole Dennis, Atavistic Andy or submit yet another screen play about Helen Keller’s clairvoyant childhood in a production called ‘The Fourth Sense,’ it will be considered contempt. Mainly because that one alone turned my own face into a sputtering, PVC irrigation hemorrhage.”

ME: “That was good, wasn’t it? I. Thought that I’d—–“

JUDGE: “GET OUT! GET OUT OF MY COURTROOM!”

I merely write this as more of a strategic focus; something that perhaps us allegedly funny guys could logroll. Woodshed. Discuss. Because it may seem like mere whimsy . . . now. McDonald’s thought the culpability sphere orbited in equal ellipses, too, until they had to buy some ambidextrous drive-through nitwit a new crotch and have their car detailed at the same time.

So what I’m saying is: Life is too short for me to pay for your new face, when I’ve got enough problems with mine without a hydraulic nasal aneurysm messing it up even further. If you have problems with such outbursts, then read this blog in Braille form. I understand humor doesn’t translate through the fingers as easily.

Posted in Fly Tying, Tenkara, Uncategorized | Tagged | 2 Comments

Motivational Interviewing, Gamesmanship, and the Fine Art Of Manipulative Chess

gamesmanship-201x300

It was my exposure to Monty Python in the early days of my life (for some reason, my Texas born, depression-era father found them funny, all the while parsing out that appalling Benny Hill) that perhaps led to my love of rhetorical tomfoolery.  I don’t know. I do know, however, that they were fully aware of the caliber-to-ballistics ratios of their foolishness.

Years later, I came across a copy of Stephen Potter’s Gamesmanship in a used bookstore.  back then, I had the impression that it was supposed to be funny–I mean the illustrations led one down the garden path of “this thing’s a hoot,” but I just didn’t absorb the subtlety of the sarcasm and wit; I was used to nuclear grade sarcasm, taken straight with a sardonia root chaser.

Now all these years later, I come across a compendium/omnibus/chrestomathy (paging H.L Mencken) called The Complete Upmanship.

And now, I get it.  The psychological gambit is far more intriguing to me than any out and out witticism joust on the field called Smarmy.

For those not in the know, Gamesmanship–a phrase one will hear in the political arena and in media all the time–is the art of winning a “game” without actually cheating.  Chances are it’s a game one might normally lose.

The fun of it all comes with Potter’s extravagant elucidations.  One of his initial examples is  in playing tennis against a formidable opponent.  The idea is not to try to actually match them skill for skill (for the assumption is bald disproportion at the outset), but to plant a seed of doubt in their mind. Case in point: practiced reflexes–those elements of professional muscle memory that are confined to what Maslow calls “unconscious competence” can be brought to the forefront with what appears as a compliment:

“You are placing those serves even more dead center than I’ve seen all week.  You must’ve made an adjustment!

At this point, their technique that was confined to the unconscious periphery–raising the chances and probability for a “choke.” This works in Chess as well, where Potter says:

The prime object of gamesmanship in chess must always be, at whatever sacrifice, to build up your reputation. In our small chess community in Marylebone it would be modesty on my part to deny that I have built up for myself a considerable name without ever actually having won a single game.

Saying things like “ooh, your Rook isn’t going to like THAT square six moves from now,” under the pretense of helpfulness, can be a literal killer at the chessboard. A less subtle tennis tactic would be to show up to the match completely outside the club policies of dress code–therby stressing out the poor, dues-paying prude to the point of self-conscious resignation.

Enter into the picture Miller and Rollnick with Motivational Interviewing. This–tome–and it’s progeny have become a sort of professional liturgy amongst law enforcement organs–and especially the juvenile divisions in which the potential for rehabilitation is still considered viable.  This process of speaking to people–which involves putting up and removing barriers to change through the normal give and take of conversation–IS effective.  But I saw right through it.  Stephen Potter was alive and well.  It was just far more subtle, less nefarious, and had an actual goal in mind other than a pyhrric victory over cribbage. The trick is, to find the positive in this:

“I’m not quitting drugs, and besides, my kids are too young to know what I’m doing.’

Now the uninitiated might see only negatives.  But the skilled practitioner will at least see her vague concern for the kids as a leverage point, and say reflectively:

“You must love your kids to keep this from them like that.”

At this point, the focus is an open “question” that allows them to start enumerating the value of the kids–and thus driving a wedge between them and their drugs.  At least in the short term.

I got sent to this class as a cave-canary in my department  because they knew–KNEW I love fooling with the language. Before I knew it I was in instructor school.  When I noticed that the manipulative DNA was similar to Potter’s twisted, labyrinthine path to Quot Erat Demonstratum, I pointed it out.

It was not appreciated.

This is where the tactics from a third book come into play with me.  A Whack On The Side Of The head, by Roger von Oech, literally spells out as productive–ALL the chicanery that got me tossed from class at the height of my Goonies phase. This book is chock full of creative catalysts–meant specifically for breaking creative blocks.

One of my favorites was the idea that deliberalty coming up with AWFUL ideas frees the person (i.e., ME) from the almost artificial onus of coming up with the “right” answer–especially since scenario work was part of the completely pedestrian-and-narcolepsy-inducing phase of the day.  AND after lunch, when half the class made it look like a gas leak was taking us out piecemeal.

So during one of the creative exercises, I did exactly that: I used every single possible parameter to galvanize scenario work into the antithesis of Motivational Interviewing:

  • Probationer tells caseload manager he wants to make his life better
  • Caseload manager asks him open questions about life/priorities
  • Probationer states he would feel more supportive if he could hold a job
  • Caseload manager reflects back that he would be “seen as a breadwinner”
  • probationer states that transportation is a major factor in both employment and sobriety classes.
  • Caseload manager sells him a car

And just like that.  I was met with crickets. No sense of humor whatsoever.

I guess I’ll have to try M.I. on them next time I see them.

Posted in Books, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

When you’re standing at the edge of the abyss, you have to jump or back away. You can’t just stand there forever.
Hunter S. Thompson

I want to make a point at the outset.

This site isn’t about me. I just happen to be the guy doing all the stuff that it IS about. But because of that, I must explain me. I happen to be someone who, even in my forties, likes to learn, research, and attempt new things.

Except for carpentry. I HATE carpentry. Hanging doors is for people that do NOT bear the intolerant underpinnings I have for tangible, pro-ratable failure. By the time I’ve made the 35th trip to Home Depot because I’ve stripped out a bolt, my driving acumen goes down dramatically. If I’m killed enroute to buying a tap and die kit right then—well . . . let’s just say one’s soul hangs over a precipice . . .

But beyond that, I’ve got a toe-hold in a myriad of things, some of which I’ve gained sufficient skill, others, I’ve simply had skill attributed to me—mainly because I took the step of doing what others in my circles have not.

“How in the WORLD did you build a cigar-box guitar? You are so talented!” says one friend.

“I bought a cigar-box, a poplar stick and some tuning pegs and put them together,” I say.

And thus, my point. It’s the chasm between wanting to do and doing that makes all the difference. To that end, this site does have to do with me. Because while I am one of those mid-level “renaissance guys,” I have a host of things I want to accomplish. And I plan to use this arena as a catalyst—a wedge—an inspirational Molotov cocktail to the recalcitrant, fence-sitting, procrastinatory refusenik I’ve become in other areas. These usually involve tangible responsibilities—not artistic digression. Sure, I can furl a fishing leader from horse hair, but a few pushups and edging my lawn might be an improvement as well. Changing my employment arena might augment my affability index, too.

Personal maintenance is part of it. But I also intend to make a few cognitive challenges this year—like memorizing the entire Gospel of John in the English Standard version. Actually, I “think” I can do it in about forty weeks without blowing up my cerebellum, but we’ll see. I’ll be covering that journey as it goes.

Now, if you are wanting to be inspired learn the Ukulele, you’re also in luck, because I’m playing one now. I’m watching James Hill and Jake Shimabukuro do it better than me. That’s goes for the guitar, harmonica, and the tin whistle. My inspiration for playing the Irish whistle came from me watching Jeff Coffin play one at a Bela Fleck and the Flecktones concert. I asked him about it, and he wrote down a bunch of cool stuff for me—a microcosm of what I’m wanting to do here.

Then, of course, we have to discuss the prodigious abilities of one Victor Wooten—bassist of the aforementioned. His book, The Music Lesson, could possibly be the best friend a burgeoning music teacher could ever have. It WILL be reviewed here. And soon. And not once does he get caught up in a discussion of theory, or mathematical algorithms ala Allan Holdsworth.

If you want to tie flies, or understand the nuances of fly fishing—cool. That goes double for a subsidiary of fly-fishing for me—Tenkara. If you want to know what THAT is, well, stick around. Speaking of Tenkara, I made a film about it:

So perhaps we’ll talk about film making. The film itself is really less about the techniques and more about the journey of making the film anyway. So my theme was already born. Along with the ridiculous cinematic alter-ego of Chuck Waders. And with all of that comes the discussion of how I built my own jib, stabilizer, and cable runner for my cameras.

And yes. The discussion of Converse tennis shoe IS possible. And encouraged.

Book reviews? You bet, but only stuff that inspired me outright. I could care less if the book is 300 years old, or 300 seconds. Sleight of hand? Yep. Take a look, peeps:

And no, I’m not explaining it. While were on that subject, I published a booklet chronicling a trick very close to this one, but I used a book that inspired me to create the rationale for the trick in the first place.

I’ve a ton of things not listed. I don’t need to list them all. Some will come here because of music. Some will come because of Tenkara. I’m hoping that all will find something encouraging. And even those of you that like satire and ridiculous comparisons: step in, the water’s boiling.

And so it goes, I keep doing stuff, because I happen to like the journeys associated with them. Fly fishing was as magical as it gets—especially the first few years. My overstuffed fly-tying kit sits in the corner to this day like a cumulative Pandora’s Box waiting for trout season. Or if you ask my family—a malignant Jumanji Game that got played one too many times.

And yes, I DO realize I’m darting all over the cognitive field. I promise— it all settles down after this.

Speaking of reflexive and knee-jerk topical shark-jumping: I’m a huge CS Lewis fan. He gets his own category here. His insights into mystery and splendor are unparalleled. Along with Mark Twain, GK Chesterton and Mary Higgins Clark.

Okay. I might be kidding on that last one. In fact, I should be subpoenaed for the juxtaposition.

Lastly, I’m hoping that the writing here also carries the day. If there IS one area that my family would tell you gives the lie to the above title, it might be that one. Writing, for me, is the one effortless undertaking . And since that is the skill most required to carry this endeavor, for that I am truly thankful. Keep coming back. The content will be lively—and diverse.

And magical.

Posted on by Ron Giesecke | 1 Comment